Empirical Research in IS: The Practice of Relevance
Empirical Research in ISThe Practice of Relevance
from MISQ (31:1) 1999
by Izak Benbasat dan Robert W. Zmud
-
[BENBASATZMUD99]
Benbasat, Izak, and Zmud, Robert W.
1999.
Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance.
MIS Quarterly, 23(1), pp. 3-16.
[T58.6 ISR SC, ISSN 1047-7047].
, March.
Keywords: Relevance, Rigor, Academic Research, Applied Research.
MEMO: Discussion and Suggestion: why most IS academic research today lacks relevance to practive.
Professionals tend to read articles that (p. 5): are shorter; use more exhibits; use everyday language, rather than esoteric or stilted language; have less discussion of a study&39;s methods; have more contextual description; have more prescriptions; (omit on article's rigor).
- See also the author's index list.
Table 1. Dimensions of Relevance (p. 13) | ||
---|---|---|
Category |
Dimensions of Relevance | Description |
Article's Content | Interesting | Does Information Systems (IS) research address the problems or challenges that are of concern to IS professionals? |
Applicable | Does IS research produce the knowledge and offer prescription that can be utilized by practitioners? | |
Current | Does IS research focus on current, at the time of publication, thechnologies, and business issues? | |
Article's Style | Accessible | Are IS research articles able to be understood (in terms of tone, style, structure, and semantics) by IS professionals? Are they written in a style that professionals would enjoy reading? |
Table 2. Recommendations to Attain Relevance (p. 14) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Recommendations |
Dimensions of Relevance Addressed | ||
Topic Selection | 1. | Focus on future interestes of key stakeholders. | Interesting |
2. | Identify topics from IS practice. | Interesting | |
3. | Identify, as an academic community, the core research issues that can influence practice in the future. | Current | |
Article's Purpose | 4. | Focus on the likely outcome (that can influence practice) rather than on inputs (academic and intellectual challenges) when choosing a research project. |
Interesting Applicable |
5. | Develop cumulative, theory-based, context rich bodies of research to be able to make prescriptions and be proactive. | Applicable | |
6. | Develop frames of references to organize phenomena and provide contingency approaches to managerial action. | Applicable | |
7. | Potray research outputs in ways practitioners can utilize to justify and retionalize IT related decisions. | Applicable | |
Article's Readability | 8. | Use clear, simple, and concise style in the write-up. | Accessible |
Editorial Process | 9. | Set the goal of publishing manuscript as being both rigorous and relevant. |
Interesting Appicable Current Acccessible |
The MIS Quarterly's copyright notice is as following:
Copyright © 1999, by the Society for Information Management
(SIM)
and the Management Information Systems Research Center
(MISRC)
of the University of Minnesota.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for
personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are
not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies
bear this notice and full citation on the first page. Copyright for
components of this work owned by others than SIM or MISRC must be
honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise,
to republish, to post on servers, or to redistribute to lists requires
prior specific permission and/or fee. Request permission to publish from: